May 7, 2009

Car burglars! Tire thieves! Walnut Creek besieged? A sign of the apocalypse?

Is Walnut Creek going to you-know-where?

First, as Walnut Creek blogger DUBC reports, a resident of the Keys Condomiums on Civic Drive woke up one morning last week to find all four wheels had been stolen. But as a "consolation prize," the thief left the sedan propped up on four milk crates. You've got to check out this photo on the DUBC's website. It's a classic, though I'm sure the car owner isn't tickled.


Second, I came across this blog on the Diablo magazine website. Apparently, Walnut Creek police are warning people to not leave purses, backpacks, laptops, and other valuables sitting in plain view in their cars. This warning came after Diablo received word from a reader about her own unpleasant experience. The reader said she had briefly parked at Heather Farm Park this week and locked her purse in the car to pop in to use the "facilities." This was at about 3:30 in the afternoon. When she returned, her car window had been smashed open, and her purse was gone.


Lt. Shelly James said Walnut Creek police have noticed, not necessarily a radical jump, but what would be better described as an uptick in such "crimes of opportunity." According to this Diablo blog, thieves are preying on parking garage and lots in towns where there are lots of cars, potentially filled with goodies in plain view, to quickly snatch. The thieves are willing to take risks, even do a smash and grab in broad daylight. The pickings are so easy, and the thieves can't walk away from a quick source of loot.



“Walnut Creek isn’t a small town anymore," James told Diablo. She added that the recession might be prompting thieves to seize those opportunities more than ever and even in brazen ways, like in the middle of the afternoon in a public parking lot.

“It’s probably increasing with the economy,” she says. “People are more desperate and do these things than in the past.”

James advises people driving to Walnut Creek to shop, eat, see a movie, or use one of the parks to always take their valuables with them or lock them up in their trunks.


I would say, no kidding. But I have to confess that I have been known to, yes, leave my purse in the car at my gym when I go to work out in the morning. It's early morning, I think. Who can see inside my car?Also, I cover my purse with a sweatshirt, or newspapers...


Silly me. Recently, I had to take my car in for some basic service, including the fact that the handle and lock on the front passenger door were not working properly. The mechanics were able to fix it without much difficulty (and no cost to me!). I was told that the problem was probably caused by someone tampering with the lock, trying to break in.


So, yes, I'll start taking Lt. James' advice. No more leaving my purse, gym bag, or other valuables in my car in plain view--including coins--available for a thief to quickly steal.

May 6, 2009

Barista's cheek piercings don't go well with my morning coffee

As a Left Coast gal, I'm usually pretty liberal when it comes to people's fashion choices, and that includes tattooing and body piercing. I think if someone is adult, she can generally adorn herself with the body art of her choice. I've seen some hip, stylish 20somethings who have the confidence and fashion sense to pull off a cascade of ear piercings and even a nose piercing or two, plus tattoos.


So, given my laissez-faire attitude about body art, I surprised myself when I stopped in at a downtown Walnut Creek coffee house after my morning workout and looked up at the young woman with whom I had just placed my order. She was a plainly dressed but reasonably attractive woman with short dark hair. She was polite, pleasant, and attentive to taking my order. But I admit I was a bit stunned when I looked up from pulling bills from my wallet and noticed two silver balls embedded in each of her cheeks, on either side of her face, where her dimples might be.


I don't know why I was stunned--and repulsed. As I've said, I've seen people with studs and hoops hanging out of their ears, lips, noses, and navels. I've even seen nipple piercings--on men, no less.

One reason I was taken aback is that I had never seen anyone with cheek piercings. So, there's the newness factor. There was also me instanstaneously imagining what it must feel like to have an earring stud piercing through your cheek. Could she feel the back of the earring inside the wall of her mouth? Could she flick her tongue over it?

But the other thought that popped into my head is not so easy to admit, because I'll come off sounding mean and insensitive.
Well, here goes. About 45 minutes earlier, I had been on the treadmill at my gym watching the morning news, which featured the press conference of face transplant recipient Connie Culp.
Absolutely, Culp is a profile in courage and resilience. She suffered the nightmare of having her husband shoot her in the head in 2004, nearly killing her, and blasting off much of her face. She survived the shooting, only to suffer the nightmare of going out in public with her crushed mid-face, and having kids point and stare at her in terror.

The miracle of modern medical science gave her a chance for a better life through a face transplant this past December, a new advance in transplant surgery. Culp chose to show herself to the world this week, she said, to foster acceptance of those who have suffered burns and other disfiguring injuries.
Her doctors said her transplant is not yet complete. The Associated Press said "her expressions are still a bit wooden. ... Her speech is at times a little tough to understand. Her face is bloated and squarish. Her skin droops in big folds ..."

It's those bid drooping folds of skin on either side of her face that, I confess, I find a little strange. Doctors plan to pare them away as her circulation improves and her nerves grow, the Associated Press said.
Looking at this coffee house barista, with the skin puckering up, even very slightly, around those silver studs embedded in her cheeks made me think of, yes, those folds of skin hanging off Connie Culp's face--folds that doctors hope to one day remove.

But I think that even if I had not caught Culp's press conference on the news this morning, I would still have been taken aback by the barista's cheek piercings. It grossed me out, frankly. Looking at the above photo I found on Wikepedia of the guy with his cheek piercing is also rather unappetizing.

I don't know why this kind of facial piercing repels me, more than others, like eyebrow or even nose piercing, although the idea of tongue piercing makes me squeamish.
Any thoughts of your own on tattoos and body piercing, and which you think is okay and which you think crosses a line?

Jurors find Martinez man guilty in 2008 Walnut Creek murder

This verdict must come as some relief to the family of Joshua Rhoads, who was shot in the head by a man who broke into his mother’s Walnut Creek home in March 2008.

A Contra Costa County Superior Court jury found Nathan Medina, 43, guilty of killing Rhoads, 25, whose family was suing Medina’s over a home construction project, KTVU and Bay City News report.

The jury didn’t buy the defense argument that Rhoads’ mother, Beverly, misidentified the man who forced her and her son to take refuge in the laundry room on March 20, 2008.

As Beverly Rhoads testified during Medina’s trial, an assailant she identified as Medina broke into her Boulevard Way home in Walnut Creek’s Saranap neighborhood. This is after, authorities say, Medina, of Martinez, cut off the electricity. Once in the house, the assailant sprayed Beverly Rhoads in the eyes with pepper spray.

As the Contra Costa Times reported, from Beverly Rhoads testimony: "In the laundry room, Joshua barricaded himself at the door between his mother and the intrude. … The gunman then opened fire, fatally wounding Joshua Rhoads. ...Beverly Rhoads, hiding behind a pile of clothes, managed to call 911, and whisper into the phone: 'It’s Nathan Medina. … He murdered my son. … He doesn't know I'm here. Please help me.'

"Medina broke the laundry-room door in half, reached inside and shot Joshua twice in the head. ... Medina was still searching for Beverly Rhoads when he shot at a Rhoads family friend who lived in a backyard cottage."

During the trial’s opening statements, prosecutor Steve Moawad said that Rhoads’ family had been friends with Medina’s family for more than 20 years. But things between the two families grew contentious when Beverly Rhoads hired a construction company, belonging to Medina’s stepfather, Tony Latteri, to build an addition to her home. According to the Times, Moawad said:

"When more than a year passed, and the proposed four-month project was still unfinished, Rhoads hired another contractor. ... She also filed a civil suit against Medina's stepfather to recover the money she lost. Medina, who had done the electrical work on the Rhoads' addition, took it upon himself to resolve the issue. … Medina didn't expect anyone else besides Beverly Rhoads to be home when he broke into her house with the intention of killing her and burning down the house."

Medina testified in “that he was framed by an unknown person who placed a recently fired gun in his truck on the day of the killing," the Times reported.

Medina's defense attorney, Dirk Manoukian, argued during trial that Beverly Rhoads' initial misidentification of Medina as her son's killer had "tainted the entire investigation," according to KTVU and Bay City News Service. He also said Beverly Rhoads had a history of blaming Medina for bad things that happened to her and that she was obsessed with the lawsuit over the construction project. Manoukian added that there were no fingerprints, fibers or DNA linking Medina to the attack.

Manoukian told reporters after the trial that he had great sympathy for what the Rhoads family has gone through. "It's a difficult, sad case all the way around," he said. But, he added, Medina's family stands by him and “will pursue any legal avenue they can to reverse the conviction.”

Medina faces 50 years to life in prison.

May 5, 2009

Good citizens: Walnut Creek police honor ordinary folks who pitched in to help out

Walnut Creek police will honor several citizens who pitched in, above and beyond, to help police do their duty over the past year. A ceremony to celebrate their service will take place 2 p.m. Tuesday, May 12 at the Lesher Center for the Arts.

Sgt. Lanny Edwards says the honorees include:

--Langley Choy, who will receive the Walnut Creek Police Department Citizen Commendation Award for assisting in what led to the arrest of a residential burglary suspect.

--Miguel Lopez, who also will receive the department's Citizen Commendation Award for assisting in what led to the arrest of a felony hit and run suspect.

--Retired Reserve Captain Don Randall, who will receive the department's Meritorious Service Award.

In addition, the department will give a nod to all newly hired or promoted master officers, police assistants, police reserves, reserve sergeants, reserve lieutenants, police offices, sergeants, lieutenants, and captain.


The ceremony is open to the public. Thanks Sgt. Edwards for letting us know about these regular people who stepped in to help out the community.

"The Soloist," schizophrenia, and my family

On Friday night, I took my 11-year-old son to see The Soloist, the new film starring Robert Downey Jr. as Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez who befriends a homeless, schizophrenic man named Nathanial Ayers (played by Jamie Foxx), who also happens to be a gifted Julliard-trained classical musician.

Some might question my maternal judgment in taking an 11-year-old boy to see a movie that deals with such adult topics as homelessness, poverty, street life, and mental illness.


I had my reasons, and not just because, at his age, he wants to experience thought-provoking works of art and entertainment. I figured he might want to see a movie that tries to honestly depict mental illness.

That’s because he and I live with someone who has schizophrenia.

That someone would be his father and my husband.

My husband of 18 years has given me permission to disclose information about his illness in this blog. He’s at a point in his life when he wants to become more public about himself, his struggles and his successes with living with his illness. He wants to help the public better understand a disease that afflicts about 1 percent of the population, or 2.2 million Americans.

My husband has what’s more specifically called schizoaffective disorder. In simple terms, schizoaffective disorder is a combination of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. He hears voices and experiences delusions and paranoia—the disorders of thought—that are typical of schizophrenia. He also suffers the mania and severe depression and anxiety—the disorders of mood—that come with bipolar disorder. In his form of bipolar, he has more of the depression and less of the mania.

He has been dealing with these symptoms in one form or another most of his life—since early childhood, as he has come to recognize. Mental health experts talk about schizophrenia and bipolar striking people in their late teens and twenties. But more and more, these experts are learning that the onset of these symptoms can begin much earlier. Young kids, or kids in early adolescence, may not be ready to understand that the strange things going on inside their heads mean they need help. They also don’t have the language to explain it. Kids, starting in pre-teens, also are so eager to fit in and be “normal” that they might not be willing to reveal private thoughts that would label them as anything but “normal.”

In support groups I attended, sponsored by the Contra Costa chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, I heard parents talk about how they knew that their children—later diagnosed with serious illnesses—were “different,” even at a young age. One mom, whose now adult son was in and out of hospitals with bipolar disorder, said she knew something was different about her son when he was an infant. She said the way he cried was much more “intense” than her other kids.

My husband knew he was pretty sick by his early teens.

But he kept it to himself. Even at 12, 13, he was perfectly aware what was going on, and could express it. But he didn’t seek help. Why? When he was growing up in the ‘70s and ‘80s, the medical and mental health community was still very much in the dark about how to deal with people who hear voices. He had an aunt with schizophrenia who was locked up the rest of her life in a mental hospital (Yes, these illnesses do run in families).

My husband was terrified of suffering the same fate.

I recently read an amazing book, The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness. This 2007 book is a beautifully written memoir of suffering from and learning to live with schizophrenia. The author is Elyn Saks, a Yale- and Oxford-educated professor of law, psychology, and psychiatry and the behavioral sciences at the University of Southern California. She describes how, in the ‘70s and ‘80s, in between studying philosophy and law at top international universities, she was locked up in hospitals, restrained, straight-jacketed, misdiagnosed, and under-treated.

It wasn’t until the ‘90s that she started to 1) accept that she had an illness that required medication and 2) much more effective medication came along to treat psychosis.

There are some key things I learned from this book, and which my husband affirms from his own experience.

--Even with medication, the voices don’t always go away. Also, Saks effectively describes the experience of “voices.” She says in every waking moment, we all have sights, sounds, smells, and sensations vying for our attention, but the brains of non-ill people have “regulators” that help them decide what to focus their attention on. For mentally ill people, that “regulator that funnels certain information and filters out other information” suddenly shuts off. “Immediately, every sight, every sound, every smell coming at you carries equal weight; every thought, feeling, memory and idea presents itself to you with an equally strong and demanding intensity.” You live with a constant din, like being in a room with the TV, stereo, and a video game turned up full blast. Add a group of crying children to the mix.

--With my husband, he hears voices that are not “real,” but that—in his head—sound very real. My husband said his voices constantly told him cruel and abusive things like “you are a piece of shit. You should never have been born.”

When we started going out and when we were first married, I didn’t know what my husband was dealing with. He didn’t tell me, perhaps out of shame, but also thinking, correctly, that I wouldn’t “get it.”

He only told me about bouts of depression. My attitude then was “just snap out of it,” “adjust your attitude.” Why should he be depressed, I wondered, if he has such a great wife, a good career, and good friends?

I was very ignorant then. When it comes to mental illness, most of us just don’t get it. Why should we, if we ourselves have never had minds and bodies overtaken by the sound of these voices? If we’ve never been given basic health information about what mental illness is about? That it is ultimately a physical, biological illness—like diabetes or heart disease. That is has nothing to do with someone having a weak or low moral character. On the contrary, at least with my husband, he is one of the strongest people I know.

For us, it all came crashing down for us in 2001, and that's when I started to learn how sick my husband was. Up until then, he had maintained this façade of happiness and success. But he had reached a point in his life and in his illness when he couldn’t hold it together. Our son was two, turning three. My husband started to wake up every morning thinking, “this is the day I’m going to kill himself.”

There are many complexities to this 2001 crisis, which are, yes, too complex to go into right now. Simple version: there was a breakdown, two hospitalizations, an incarceration, and consultations with a series of mental health experts—psychoanalysts, psychologists, psychiatrists, marriage and family counselors, researchers at Stanford University. This process, and his current psychiatrist, led him to his current diagnosis, his course of treatment, and his “cocktail” of medications, some of which I don’t think were available 10 years ago.

One point that Saks accurately makes, which was the case with my husband: “A common misunderstanding is that people with schizophrenia are wildly psychotic all the time. Most, like myself, are not. When I am symptomatic, I suffer from delusions and hallucinations, and my thinking becomes confused and disorganized.”

The psychosis can float in and out, unexpectedly, even at different points in the day. The fact that psychosis is not constant means that some people can seem to function quite well and at high levels at school, work, and in personal relationships—like Elyn Saks or my husband.
And like Saks, my husband was very determined to accomplish certain things in life. He did well in school and in college, where we met. He studied at a top US university and had professors who wanted him to stay in school and earn a PhD in his field.

But he had other ideas. He wanted to travel, live overseas, see the world. He also wanted to do community service, and he wanted to fall in love, get married, become a father.

So, he worked hard to keep his voices in check, his outer mask of mental wellness on display. Maintaining that façade of sanity was pretty exhausting, but he had to do it, he says, because “I don’t like to lose.”

The cocktail of medications he now takes allows him to function pretty well—with some irksome side effects (fatigue, weight gain, shakes in his hands). Still, I am lucky that he is one of those people with mental illness who is able to comprehend that he is sick—many are not able to make this connection—and that he wants to do what’s necessary to stay as well as possible, for as long as possible.

He now works in a pretty demanding job. Actually, it’s a job that a lot of us would find stressful and exhausting, because he has to deal with big egos and works a lot of hours. He’s able to manage, he jokes, because he’s so medicated. His bosses know about his illness. They are pretty progressive in this regard.

So, he’s dealt with some pretty horrific things throughout his life. At the same time, he is a wonderful, loving man, with a lot of friends and family who helped us out when things got bad. It was a shock to everyone who knew him to learn he had been struggling much of his life with such private turmoil.

Seeing The Soloist on Friday prompted a family discussion on Saturday. My husband didn’t accompany us to the movie. He rarely goes to see movies these days, he says, because they make him psychotic.

But he was happy to hear what we had to say about the film. One thing, he immediately said is that my son has scolded him for referring to himself as “crazy.” My son doesn’t mind if his father talks openly about having a mental illness, but believes that his dad referring to himself as “crazy” is demeaning, and my son doesn’t like his dad putting himself down.

(I asked my son if he minded me having this blog, Crazy in Suburbia, or referring to myself as “crazy” Soccer Mom. No, he said, with a shrug and a smile. Even at 11, he understands that my “crazy” moniker is my own silliness, though, yes, I’ve got my issues. Ultimately, my son is able to distinguish between his mom’s brand of craziness and what’s going on with his father, which is very real and very serious. )

We told my husband about the need of Jamie Foxx’s character, Nathanial Ayers, to live outside on the streets, and to play his music amidst the noise of the city and of traffic. As he gets to know Ayers and to understand schizophrenia, Downey’s Lopez learns why Ayers needs to be outside. The city noise drowns out the much more troubling and scattered cacophony of voices inside Ayers’ own head. My husband said, yes, that’s the way it can be. The voices can be multi-layered, relentless, contradictory, and confusing. It’s not like the sound loop of thoughts that non-ill people have playing in our heads throughout the day.

My husband also understood Ayers’ need to constantly play music. My husband played French horn in high school, and he said playing music quieted his voices. He also said that he didn’t hear voices when he played tennis or read. So, growing up, he played a lot of music, did a lot of reading, and played a lot of tennis.


I told my husband how the film also shows Ayers, in flashback as a boy, beginning to withdraw into his music—as the illness and the voices begin to descend upon him.

Some critics have poked at The Soloist for not having a more “dramatic” or “uplifting” resolution. I think they were looking for Downey’s columnist character to get Ayers into treatment, where Ayers would “see the light,” start taking meds, resume his professional music career, and have a stellar debut at Carnegie Hall. Or some such nonsense.

I loved how the film showed that there is no cure—no easy resolution—when you’re dealing with something like schizophrenia. I found the delicate and unconventional connection made between these two men to be truthful, and therefore dramatic and uplifting. No, Foxx’s Ayers does not become cured. He doesn’t even accept that he has schizophrenia and start taking medication. But he makes a friend, reconnects with his sister, and continues to play his music, privately and on his own terms.

Saks points out the long list of people with mood disorders, such as depression or bipolar, who have led full and famously productive lives: Writers, artists, even historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln.

Unfortunately, there is no such list for people with schizophrenia. Saks says few people with schizophrenia lead happy and productive lives, or “those who do aren’t in a hurry to tell the world about themselves.”

My husband sometimes mentions various statistics, not to scare me, but to keep it real between us: such as about how half of people with this illness can’t live or function independently, and suicide is the leading cause of death. He also tells me that, all of a sudden and without warning, his meds could stop working, and he could wake up one morning with full blown psychosis. And not know where he is, who he is, who we are. That happened with a woman he met in a support group he attended.

But he’s pretty happy with his meds right now, feel that they are doing what they need to do, and more and more he shares things with me about what it was like for him growing up, what it is like for him now. Most of all, he feels immense gratitude: for being sane. For being in the place in life he is now. That’s my dramatic, uplifting ending to this story. For now anyway.

To be continued ...

For more information about mental illness and schizophrenia, visit:

May 3, 2009

Remember when? Once upon a time, Walnut Creek looked like this.



I actually don't remember when Walnut Creek looked like this. This photo was taken long before my arrival in town: at Kaiser hospital in a year I won't disclose. Actually, this photo by Ted Gurney shows North Main Street looking north from Mt. Diablo Boulevard in 1952. Hmm, 1952. My parents moved to Walnut Creek a year later.

This photo is part of an interesting exhibition of photos, Then and Now, on display in the City Council chamber at City Hall. The exhibition consists of 25 such historic photos of Walnut Creek, dating back to 1927, that are then juxtaposed with 2008 photos showing the same locations. The new photos were taken by Andy Smith, a senior planner with the City's Community Development Department and an accomplished amateur photographer. He selected the vintage photos and then sought out to capture images of the same place years later in order to show how a community like Walnut Creek changes through time.

Thanks to Brad Rovanpera, the city's public information officer and expert historian, for sharing this photo.

May 2, 2009

The killing of Pamela Vitale and the life sentence for Scott Dyleski—a tragedy all around in this horrific 2005 Lafayette murder case

On Monday, a state appeals court upheld the conviction of Scott Dyleski, a former Lafayette teen, who was convicted of brutally killing Pamela Vitale, 52, in her rural Hunsaker Canyon home on October 15, 2005.


Dyleski was 16 at the time of Vitale’s killing and a neighbor of hers. The case had a lot of sensational, lurid elements that made it fodder for Court TV, Nancy Grace, and for headlines on local TV and radio and in the newspapers. Vitale was bludgeoned, possibly with a rock, and stabbed, and a double-crossed "T" was etched into her back. She was the wife of prominent attorney Daniel Horowitz, who had became one of Grace’s favorite “legal analysts” during the Scott Peterson trial.


Horowitz was also in the midst of defending another of Court TV’s favorite murder defendants, housewife Susan Polk, who was charged with killing her psychologist husband, Felix, in their posh Orinda hillside home. (The Polk case later became the subject of two books; one by Orinda writer Carol Pogash, Seduced by Madness, offered an especially good picture of the madness of Ms. Polk, as well as the craziness that lurks beneath our shiny, happy East Bay suburbs.)

Finally, there was the suspect himself, Scott Dyleski. He was described in various news accounts as a former Eagle Scout and dutiful young man who later turned to the "dark side" by dabbling in Goth fashion and creating drawings and poetry filled with dark, violent images. His home-life was—well--not conventional by the standards of Lafayette’s seemingly idyllic suburban Burton Valley or Happy Valley. He and his mother lived in an eco-friendly, strawbale home with two other families.

Maybe, according to some speculation, Dyleski had been bullied at high-achieving Acalanes High School, which he attended for two years before transferring to Diablo Valley College. Maybe, he had become depressed after the traffic death of his older half-sister when he was in middle school. Maybe, Columbine-killer-like, he was seething underneath with anti-social rage and pathology, and he exploded one fair October Saturday morning and took out his anger on Vitale. She was home alone at the time, supposedly surfing the Internet and looking forward to attending the ballet with a friend that evening.
Prosecutor Harold Jewett suggested that Dyleski was involved in a scam to steal credit card information from his rural Hunsaker Canyon neighbors to finance purchases of equipment needed to start a home marijuana growing operation. Or, Jewett also suggested, Dyleski was angry at a neighbor who hit and fatally injured his family dog, Jazz, two weeks before Vitale’s killing. And he mistook Vitale for that neighbor.

Maybe, maybe, maybe.

Lots of speculation and possible explanations for why Dyleski killed Vitale. But the trial never really told us anything definitive. I can say that with some authority. I attended some of the trial, including the opening and closing arguments and Dyleski's sentencing. I heard Vitale’s gracious and articulate daughter, Marisa Vitale, say, at Dyleski’s sentencing that it added to her pain to not be able to understand “why” her mother died.

One of the jurors told reporters that the ultimate “why” of this crime eluded him and the other jurors as well, but they all agreed that the evidence, including DNA evidence, pointed to Dyleski as the killer. The evidence also pointed to him committing the crime during a burglary, which, in turn, made it a special circumstances case that allowed Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Barbara Zuniga to sentence him to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Those special circumstances could have made Dyleski, had he been 18 years or older at the time of the killing, eligible for the death penalty. But, as it happens, the US Supreme Court, outlawed the death penalty for juvenile killers in 2005.

So, I read about the appeals court decision Monday in the San Francisco Chronicle, and I thought about posting something right away. But I decided to stay away from it for a few days.

This case was particularly upsetting to me--much more than it should have been. I didn't know anyone involved. Maybe it was upsetting because it involved the community of the high school I attended: Acalanes. Maybe it was upsetting because I could see the way the crime--including the massive media coverage--was traumatizing people on both sides of the case and in the community in which I live. Overall, I found the crime and the grief, anger, and devastation it left in its wake to be heartbreaking.

I read some of the comments that people left on the SFGate.com story about Dyleski’s conviction being upheld. Some people described him as a monster and said they were glad he would rot in the hell of prison for the rest of his life.

Given what became public about the case, and the defense strategy--Dyleski's attorney saying there was insufficient evidence that he committed the crime--it's hard to dispute this view that Dyleski is a remorseless teen sociopath.

Still, I strongly believe there is more to story and more to Dyleski--and that we don't really know why this crime happened. The investigation and trial, in my opinion, skimmed the surface. No, I am not in league with some conspiracy theorists who, for a while--and maybe still are--pushing the notion that somehow Dyleski, now 20, was framed.

Maybe the "why" of why this terrible crime happened will come out one day, and maybe there's a way to see Dyleski as something other than that monster and remorseless sociopath.

Of course, some might ask, does it matter? Do we really need to know more? Didn't the jury convict the right person? Didn't the judge impose the right sentence and take a dangerous killer off the streets for ever?

Maybe it just matters to me. For a while, crazy me, became a bit obsessed with finding out the "why." I didn't get too far.

But perhaps knowing more of the "why" would still help Vitale's family and friends. In talking to familes of other murder victims, I've learned that many long harbor the need to know "why." It's essential for them to be able to formulate the "narrative" of a traumatic event. It helps them make sense of it, and somehow having that "story" helps them heal.

Knowing the "why" might also be useful to Dyleski's friends and family. And, ultimately, it might be instructive to the community, raising awareness about “red flags” to look for when young people are at risk of hurting themselves or others.

I think the case also sheds light on the need of our criminal justice system--as over-burdened as it already is--to do more than just skim the surface of cases, especially ones like this that receive massive amounts of media coverage and involve a brutal crime and a young defendant.

To me, justice is about more than identifying and convicting a criminal. It's also about revealing the truth, the "why." Because the truth and knowing the "why" can lead to healing--for friends and families of the victims, for the friends and families of the defendants, for the community, and for, yes, for the defendants themselves.

Does Walnut Creek’s emphasis on the arts and recreation help or hurt its fiscal health?

City Manager Gary Pokorny was blunt in the latest issue of the Walnut Creek's newsletter The Nutshell: "The city is facing a $3.5 million shortfall in 2009-10 and shortfall in 2009-10 and worse in later years. years. We must make difficult spending cuts…" He added that the major economic downturn has hurt auto sales, housing values, employment, and, as a result, city revenues. “The unfortunate reality is that the City is simply no longer able to do ‘business as usual.’ "

As this May/June issue of Nutshell hit our mailboxes, and the city’s website, the city announced a series of workshops to gain public input on how the city should address its financial challenges in the years to come. They will be held May 11, 16, and 18.

Meanwhile, fellow Walnut Creek blogger, The DUBC, in an April 8 article, showed how Walnut Creek spends a larger percentage of its budget on arts and recreation services than some other East Bay cities and less on police services. Walnut Creek spends about 21 percent of its budget on arts, recreation, and community services, and 33 percent on police services. This story by the DUBC, a blogger who does a much better job of following Walnut Creek’s budget issues than I do, generated lots of good debate and information. I suggest you check it out.


The story was comparing Walnut Creek’s ratio of arts and recreation to police services spending to towns like Concord, Antioch, Pittsburg, and Richmond. From some poking around myself, I found that Walnut Creek’s ratio is similar to local cities like San Ramon, Pleasanton, and Danville.

It would be great if, as one anonymous Walnut Creek police officer commented, that the city could afford to put 15 more officers on the street. According to this officer, Chief Joel H. Bryden, nine months on the job, has said that these 15 more cops would make Walnut Creek a much safer place. But, alas, the city can't.

I am sure there are some who think that Walnut Creek is a perfectly safe city and that maybe the police have so little to do they can launch a jaywalking sting on Las Lomas students (as I reported in a recent story).

I check out the Walnut Creek police log from time to time. While they are not regularly racing out to reports or robberies, shootings, or homicides, like their fellow officers in Richmond, I see that the officers keep themselves busy with calls coming into the department every few minutes.

In his response to comments, the DUBC says that by showing how the city spends its money, “We are not saying fund this area and not that one. We love Open Space, the arts, well maintained streets and all the other things the city provides. Hopefully these numbers help people understand where the city currently spends money so they can express their opinions, good or bad, on the direction we are going.”

I happen to be a fan of Walnut Creek’s arts and recreation programs. My son will attend a couple sessions of the city-run sports camps this summer, and I learned this week, at a meeting for parents of incoming Walnut Creek Intermediate School students, that the city coordinates after-school sports programs at this school and at Foothill Middle School. The city employs the coaches, officials and scorekeepers for basketball, soccer, flag football, softball, volleyball, golf and track.


As for Walnut Creek’s arts programs, Walnut Creek’s Civic Arts Education program is reportedly one of the oldest and most admired in the state.

And most important of all, in these tough economic times, the economic benefits of the city having a thriving arts and culture scene have been well documented.

Walnut Creek has twice participated in an Arts and Economic Prosperity study carried out by Americans for the Arts, the nation’s leading nonprofit in promoting arts programs.

The latest study, released in 2007, showed the city’s nonprofit arts and cultural organizations “are a significant industry in the city—one that generates $56.2 million in local economic activity. This spending--$18.6 million by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and an additional $37.6 million in event-related spending by their audiences—supports 1,482 full-time equivalent jobs, generates $26.6 million in household income to local residents, and delivers $5.8 million in local and state government revenue.”

I also know people who are involved in the Diablo Regional Arts Association. This is the nonprofit group that raises money for theater, dance, music, and visual arts programs put on at the Lesher Center for the Arts. Some of the biggest movers and shakers in business, in Walnut Creek and in nearby towns, are members or are on the board of the DRAA. Major sponsors or partners of the DRAA include oil giant Chevron Corp., Wells Fargo Bank, and Target. I recently heard the DRAA’s board president, Gary Fisher, Chevron’s general manager of corporate public policy, tell a group of area business leaders that supporting arts is good for their own bottom line.

Walnut Creek’s thriving arts scene makes it a desirable place for a business to locate, and a desirable place for its employees to work and live (if they can afford it, but that’s a whole other issue that businesses have to struggle with).

Walnut Creek’s downtown wouldn’t be the retail, dining, and entertainment hub that it is—even in this tough economy—without the Lesher Center. Or, so I’ve been told time and time again by my artsy friends: Broadway Plaza bookending one end of the downtown’s core; the Lesher Center, which opened 19 years ago, bookending the other.

Oh, and, from what I’ve further been told, Center Repertory Company, the in-house theater company at the Lesher Center, has been breaking records for attendance the last two years. Seats are 90 percent filled on most performance nights, compared with 60 percent a couple years ago. Meanwhile, tomorrow’s performance by the Walnut Creek-based California Symphony at the Lesher Center is sold out.

So, even in these tough economic times, people are willing to shell out $$$ for movies and quality entertainment.

Actually, that was true in the Depression. Hollywood raked it in, offering people an escape from the grim daily headlines of job losses, stock market dives, and breadlines. These days, we want escape from the grim daily headlines of job losses, stock market dives, swine flu, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, nuclear threats from Iran, Pakistan and North Korea, and debates over whether our nation engaged in torture.

Swine flu may be turning up in San Ramon, Pleasanton; students in Concord tested; but the disease may not be as potent as first feared


Update 1 p.m. The Contra Costa Times says that Lone Tree Elementary in Antioch will be closed Monday and possibly remain closed for up to two weeks after a student there tested probable for the swine flu.


Earlier Saturday: Contra Costa County Health officials announced Friday night that they were closing Coyote Creek Elementary in San Ramon after a probable case of H1N1 virus—what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention prefers to now call the swine flu—showed up there. So reports CBS5.


Also, 13 students and one staff member in the Pleasanton schools were tested for possible infection, though the results have not yet come back yet, the Pleasanton Weekly says. Students at a Concord elementary also were tested, but those results turned out negative.


These young people and adults join the some 20 people, whose suspected or confirmed cases of infection, have shown up in the Bay Area in the past week.


Worries about the spread of the illness have so far prompted the closure of nine schools throughout the Bay Area, CBS5 says, including the one in San Ramon, one in Pittsburg and one, announced Friday, in Bay Point, the Contra Costa Times says. At the Bay Point school, a second grader tested positive for the illness. Those schools will remain closed for 14 days in accordance with new CDC guidelines.


John Muir Medical Center this week set up tents at its Walnut Creek and Concord campuses to examine patients who fear they might have the illness, the Times says. Health officials have been encouraging people who have mild flu-like symptoms to contact their doctors instead of overloading hospitals.


The CDC says that there have so far been 141 cases of H1N1 infection, according to the CDC. Most of the cases have been mild, and one flu expert told the Huffington Post that there's no reason to believe the new virus is a more serious strain than seasonal flu. However, one death has been confirmed in the United States, a toddler from Mexico who was visiting the United States.

For more information about the swine flu, including known facts about the virus, symptoms, and links to national and local public health sites, visit CBS5.com's Health Watch page.

May 1, 2009

County finds one small way to make more money: raise fees for removing and storing dead people

The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors this week approved a way for the severely cash-strapped Sheriff’s Deparment to bring in an additional $90,000. The Sheriff’s Department, which also runs the Coroner’s Department, has been granted the authority to charge more than twice as much for removing and storing dead bodies.

Under state law, county coroners can charge for removing and storing a dead body. This fee “is not assessed for persons who are indigent, or when the decedent is 14 years of age or younger or was the victim of a crime.”

Captain Jon Cox, the chief deputy of the Coroner’s Office, told the supervisors at their Tuesday meeting that Contra Costa has only charged $100 per body removal for quite a while. He was requesting that supervisors allow the Coroner’s Office to raise that fee to $267.


In a report to the supervisors, the Coroner’s Office said it handled the removal of 668 bodies in the previous fiscal year. I haven’t asked yet, but I’m assuming that the Coroner’s Office is, in some cases, referring to those cases of someone who suddenly dies at home or some place else, in which the coroners need to come, remove the body, and hold it until it can be transported to a funeral home for services.


In 543 of those 668 cases, fees were assessed. The Coroner’s Office bases its need for revenue increase on their estimate that it takes a coroner’s deputy an average of three hours to pick up and remove a body—and the hourly rate for a deputy is around $89.


There was no public debate at the supervisors meeting about this request (which you can watch here), and Supervisor Mary N. Piepho praised the Sheriff’s Department for coming up with a way to “recapture the costs of services” the county provides.


Of course, $90,000 is probably the proverbial drop in the bucket, considering that the Sheriff’s Department had to slash its budget and lay off 56 deputies.

County librarian to work with WC on maintaining hours at the Ygnacio Valley Library

Contra Costa County Librarian Anne Cain tells me that the county library system’s plan to shift $1.2 million in costs to the cities should have no impact on the new downtown Walnut Creek library under construction, but that it could have some impact on hours at the library on Oak Grove Road.

The new library won’t be affected because “cities are already responsible for all facility and property management costs for new facilities.”

But Ygnacio Valley Library hours could be cut. The library is currently open 56 hours, but could lose four hours, according to a county library report. The library also maintains the temporary Park Place library at Civic Park.

There are different options the library is looking at to maintain those hours, as Cain explained in a report to the Board of Supervisors Tuesday. As part of its plan to shift $1.2 million in costs to cities, the library is looking to ask Walnut Creek to pitch in $137,174.

“We will be having discussions with the City of Walnut Creek about the Ygnacio Valley Library,” Cain tells me.

In an editorial, the Contra Costa Times says cities must step up to help retain library hours, especially in these tough economic times.



In fact, library use has increased as the economy has worsened. Anne Cain, county librarian, says that there has been a huge increase in all of the library services.

More people are using libraries for job searches and research. In lower-income communities, often the library is the only place students have access to computers outside of school. Also, the county's 25 libraries provide free entertainment, which is more in demand during an recession.

The county would continue to provide library services and leave maintenance and building costs to the cities that now enjoy county subsidies.

That means if individual cities wish to retain current library hours they will have to come up with funds to maintain the buildings.

Cain is right in saying that it would be more equitable for all cities to pay for library building maintenance, especially during a recession that has hit county revenues particularly hard.


We understand that cities also have financial problems, but they should be able to collectively come up with the funds necessary to maintain the libraries within their own borders.