March 8, 2012

Bad habits on the brain


I keep thinking I need to eat better: more vegetables and fruits, fewer calories, less snacking and less sugar. 

I don’t know if I need more will power and self-discipline to change my eating habits. I’m hearing that the idea of will power is vastly overrated.  In any case, I have always found that attempting to make a major lifestyle change requires a lot of mental energy. 

A new book The Power of Habit by New York Times business writer Charles Duhigg confirms that habit change is very much about focus and attention because all our habits – good and bad – originate in the brain. 

That is, neuroscientists have traced our habit-making behaviors to the part of the brain called the basal ganglia, “which also plays a key role in the development of emotions, memories and pattern recognition,” according to an article about Duhigg’s book that accompanies a podcast of his interview with Terry Gross of NPR radio’s Fresh Air. 

I heard Duhigg’s interview earlier this week. In explaining the behavioral and neurological patterns that give rise to habits, he also helped me understand those moments of forgetfulness that lead me to wonder if early dementia is setting in. 

When I drive my son and his friend home from school I often turn up our street automatically instead of proceeding straight ahead to take my son’s friend home first. “Mom! You have to take Ty home first,” my son always reminds me. 

Or, I’ll pull into the parking lot at Safeway, not remembering what I came for. For a brief few seconds, I won’t even remember getting into the car to drive to the store.  

In these situations, my mind has been on something else. I’ve been listening to an interesting author, like Duhigg, on the radio, or to my son and his friend gossiping about other kids at school. Or, I’ve been crafting sentences in my head for an article I’m working on. Or ruminating about politics, an annoying world situation or things I need to do before I turn 50. 

With regard to my trips to the grocery store bringing my son home, the part of my brain controlling my driving has gone on auto-pilot.  As soon as any activity – driving to and from a regular destination, brushing my teeth, reaching for a sweet for a post-lunch snack – becomes automatic, the brain goes into a sort of sleep mode, Duhigg. Our basal ganglia takes a behavior and turns it into an automatic routine, or habit. 

In some ways, the brain starts working less when you’re doing a routine. "The brain can almost completely shut down,” Duhigg said. “And this is a real advantage, because it means you have all of this mental activity you can devote to something else. … "You can do these complex behaviors without being mentally aware of it at all," he says. 

The habit loop involves a three-part neurological process. First, there is a cue, or trigger, that tells your brain to go into automatic mode, then there is the routine or behavior itself, and then there is the reward. 

Knowing about the cue and reward parts of the habit loop can help people change habits or break the bad ones. From my experience, you have to put mental energy into becoming more aware of the triggers and then reducing the triggers. If you're trying to lose weight, you're told to keep a food journal to become more mindful about what you're putting into your mouth, when and for what reason. We've also heard about  recovering drug addicts who avoid going to parts of town where they used to score drugs, or alcoholics who stay out of bars or away from hard-drinking friends. Employing those kinds of strategies for reducing triggers involves various degrees of planning.

Lab studies show that it’s never too late to break a habit, Duhigg said. 

“Habits are malleable throughout your entire life,” Duhigg said. “But we also know that the best way to change a habit is to understand its structure — that once you tell people about the cue and the reward and you force them to recognize what those factors are in a behavior, it becomes much, much easier to change."

March 5, 2012

The art of Neiman Marcus

UPDATE Tuesday: Neiman Marcus Tuesday posted an article on its website with lots of cool images of the art that is coming to the Walnut Creek store. (Above is a painting Lakewater 10 by Robin Kandel)


Neiman Marcus is set to host a grand opening gala Thursday night and then open its store to shoppers Friday. Not only will the department store chain offer a high-end retail experience, it will also introduce customers to works by notable Bay Area artists.

Walnut Creek Patch editor Lance Howland reports that Neiman Marcus has a corporate art curator who has spent the better part of the past year visiting Bay Area galleries and selecting works to grace the chain's 42nd store. Neiman Marcus officials say the store has 163 paintings, prints, sculptures and other works. Most of them are based in the Bay Area.
(Above: Lisa Espenmiller, paintings located on the 2nd floor in the Customer Forum.) 

One of the artists is Ned Kahn who likes to create large-scale sculptural works "that increase people's awareness of natural phenomena." On the front wall of the building, he has erected Wind Fins (above from a this YouTube video) ,vertical fins that sway in the wind.

For a list of the artists and the kinds of works they create, check out Lance's story. 

Meanwhile, the Contra Costa Times reported last week that the opening of Neiman Marcus is just one sign that downtown Walnut Creek's retail scene is bouncing back. Walnut Creek will also see a new Anthropologie store and a new home products store, called Tuesday Morning, opening in the space at California Boulevard and Bothelo that has seen a bit of turnover in recent years. As the Beyond the Creek blogger says, Lane Home Furnishing tried to make a go of it before. (Personally, I wish they would bring back something like the bowling alley they once had in that space so long ago.)


"The burst of commercial activity has banished a two-year slump for Walnut Creek's downtown, which ranks alongside San Francisco's Union Square, Palo Alto's Stanford Shopping Center and San Jose's Santana Row as one of the nation's premier shopping districts," writes Contra Costa Times writer George Avalos.



March 4, 2012

Something I’m contemplating: becoming a better sleep role model for my son



There are so many more things I get to worry about now that my son is entering adolescence. But one important question I haven’t really considered is whether he’s getting enough sleep.

He probably isn’t if he’s a typical American adolescent.

He should be getting 9.25 hours but I know he's not. Lack of adequate sleep among teens is rampant, and it’s becoming a major concern among public health and safety experts.

That’s something I learned about recently, courtesy of Lafayette filmmaker Vicki Abeles. Her education documentary Race to Nowhere has been showing in communities throughout the country, including in Walnut Creek.  I was the parent education coordinator for Walnut Creek Intermediate who helped organize a fall 2010 screening at Las Lomas High School, as I wrote for Walnut Creek Patch. 
Race to Nowhere provoked quite a discussion that night among parents, teachers, administrator and students in the audience. The film spotlights what Abeles calls the toxic culture of achievement that has become the norm in America’s education culture – and this culture's unintended health consequences for children.
A major consequence is sleep deprivation, Abeles says. While making the documentary, she interviewed  teenagers who were seriously skimping on sleep as they juggled homework, extracurricular activities and prepping for tests.

Teens also have trouble sleeping because they, like the rest of us, have become avid consumers of coffee-house lattes and other caffeinated beverages and because they have gotten so plugged into technology. They stay up late surfing the Web, text messaging or playing games.

A 2010 study by University of Missouri education researchers found that 85 percent of adolescents suffer from sleep deprivation. Another study, reported in the Journal of Adolescent Health, found that only 8 percent of teens get the recommended 9.25 hours of sleep; nearly 70 percent receive seven hours or less.

Unfortunately,sleep loss undermines academic achievement and feeds anxiety, depression, poor impulse control, acting out and "escapist behaviors such as drinking, drugs and sex," Abigail Baird, a neuroscientist and professor at Vassar College, told Abeles.
Speaking of alcohol use, I, like most parents worry about how my son will start going out with friends. And, there will be drinking. And, then he and the others could get into  a car and the intoxicated young driver will crash it.

But now, I’m learning that “drowsy driving” can be just as hazardous as drunk driving. Sleep loss leads to thousands of car crashes a year in the United States, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The highest risk group for drowsy driving accidents are young drivers, ages 16 to 29.

This week is National Sleep Awareness Week. To mark this occasion, Abeles has invited physicians from around the country to view the film as part of a live, online stream.  So far, more than 700 physicians have registered to watch it. They are also invited to take part in an online discussion.
Abeles and her Reel Link Films  company also launched a "Sleep Challenge."Abeles hopes it will encourage a cultural attitude adjustment around sleep. On the Race to Nowhere site is a "sleep tool kit" that suggests ways for students, teachers, schools and parents to make changes in schedules, policies and lifestyles to make sleep more of a daily priority. 

For students to try to get the recommended 9.25 hours per night, they can:
  • Set a regular schedule for going to bed and waking up 
  • Eliminate caffeine intake after lunch time 
  • Turn off electronics at night or even removing them from the bedroom.

The tool kit suggests similar strategies for parents to “model good sleeping habits” for their children.  We parents should be getting seven to nine hours of sleep at night.

Seven to nine hours of sleep a night? I typically get close to seven, but nine? No way. To get seven, I have to say no to staying up late to work, write, surf the Web, watch old movies.

There is that mantra, "progress not perfection." It could certainly apply to my efforts around being a better sleep role model. But making progress would be worth it. The evidence is pretty convincing that we all need to sleep better.  
Areas where I need to make progress? I need to cut back on caffeine, especially after lunch time. It would also be good for me to rethink keeping my laptop on a nightstand next to my bed.

A challenge for our entire family, suggested by the Race to Nowhere sleep tool kit, would be to go technology free an hour before bedtime and avoiding all caffeinated drinks for an entire week.

Hmm, the technology-free hour is possible but no caffeine for a week?

Progress not perfection.

March 1, 2012

Lawsuit over 2010 Contra Costa prosecutor battle muddle

Let's have a little talk about tweetle beetles....

What do you know about tweetle beetles? Well...

When tweetle beetles fight,
it's called a tweetle beetle battle ... 



One of the many brilliant tongue twisters in Dr. Seuss' brilliant tongue-twister book, Fox in Socks, came to mind while I was reading an update on the prosecutor shenanigans that have plagued an arguably dysfunctional Contra Costa District Attorney's Office.

In one of what seemed to be almost weekly installments of Prosecutors Gone Wild, a March 2010 argument between top prosecutors literally turned bloody.  Lead homicide attorney Harold Jewett threw a punch at Paul Sequeira, sending Sequeira to the hospital to get stitches below one eye.


The latest news is that Sequeira is doing what lawyers do when they can't employ healthy, socially positive methods to let go and move on with life.

Sequeira has filed a lawsuit. The Contra Costa Times reports that Sequeira, who was third-in-command in the office at the time of the fight, accuses Jewett, named "prosecutor of the year" by the California District Attorney's Office in 2008, of assault and battery. The suit seeks unspecified damages against Jewett.

As I reported back in March 2010, the fight between these two feisty prosecutors took place amidst rising tensions in the very heated 2010 District Attorney's race. The fight echoed political divisions in the office, where prosecutors were apparently lining up behind two leading candidates to replace Bob Kochly, who did not seek re-election. Jewett backed fellow prosecutor Mark Peterson, who eventually won the election. Sequeira backed Dan O'Malley, a former deputy district attorney who is now in private practice. O'Malley was Kochly's chosen successor.

The argument between Jewett and Sequeira erupted over a letter Jewett sent to the editor of the Contra Costa Times. In that letter, Jewett contended that managers in the district attorney's office and in the prosecutors' union were prioritizing politics over law enforcement. The East Bay Express says Sequeira had been accused of inappropriately influencing colleagues to support O'Malley.

The Contra Costa Times reported that the fight "shocked" the local legal community with the two men considered among the county's top legal talent. Apparently, though, the two had a "history of butting heads," the Times reported. With the election, job assignments were at stake.

Indeed, after Peterson won the election, he demoted Sequeira to deputy district attorney, said the Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Sequeira left Contra Costa County in August 2011 to become assistant district attorney in Mendocino County.

And, just before he left his Contra Costa County job,  Sequeira got into a scuffle with a defense investigator who was trying to serve him with a subpoena to testify in the other sordid story swirling around the Contra Costa DA's office at the time.

This was the rape prosecution of Michael Gressett, a veteran sex crimes prosecutor who was accused of sexually assaulting a female subordinate. The East Bay Express says Kochly handled the case "in such a questionable way" that suspicions arose in the office that the rape charges were more "about political maneuvering than seeking justice." Peterson was demoted after complaining about investigation irregularities.  O'Malley also was subpoenaed by Gressett's defense team who wanted to show that O'Malley injected himself in the case by acting as a liaison between the alleged victim and Kochly.

A judge dismissed the charges against Gressett in October on the grounds that a grand jury did not hear evidence that might have undermined the alleged victim's credibility.

While Sequeira moved up to the Mendocino County District Attorney's Office, he apparently has not been able to leave what happened with Jewett behind. The Contra Costa Times said Sequeira also has a pending claim against the county in which he seeks $300,000. 

No criminal charges were filed against Jewett, who was placed on 30 days unpaid administrative leave after the incident. While Jewett publicly said he regretted the fight, he has also said he struck Sequeira in self-defense. 

So, now Sequeira will contribute to the jam-up in the Contra Costa County court system with his lawsuit. And, once again I return to the words of the master, Dr. Seuss:


When a fox is 
in the bottle where  
the tweetle beetles battle
with their paddles
in a puddle on a
noodle-eating poodle. 

THIS is what they call... 
... a tweetle beetle
noodle poodle bottles
paddled muddled duddled
fuddled wuddled
fox in socks, sir!





February 29, 2012

No surprise but unfortunate: Sufism Reoriented project approved

The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Wednesday approved Sufism Reoriented's plans to build a large, white multi-domed sanctuary in the Saranap neighborhood of unincorporated Walnut Creek, reports the Contra Costa Times. 

Four of the five supervisors cast yes votes for the worship center, to be built on 3.12 acres off Boulevard Way.. Supervisor Gayle Uilkema, whose district is near the proposed sanctuary, listened to the meeting by phone Wednesday but did not vote.

Elisabeth Nardi will be updating her story later, and Walnut Creek Patch Editor Lance Howland tweeted that the supevisors had added a list of conditions for the 66,000-square-foot project. 

The approval comes following an all-day special public hearing last Tuesday at the Lesher Center for the Arts and several hours of testimony Wednesday. 





 


Photo of bank robber released

Walnut Creek are seeking the public's help in finding this man who robbed the Bank of the West on California Boulevard Wednesday morning.

Here are details from a Walnut Creek police press release:

On February 29, 2012 at about 9:30 AM the suspect entered Bank of the West on California Blvd. and demanded cash from the teller. The suspect was given an undisclosed amount of money from the teller and then fled the bank. He was last seen walking northbound on California Boulevard. No weapons were seen. Officers searched the area, but were unable to locate the subject. Anyone with information is encouraged to call WCPD at 925-943-5844.

February 28, 2012

How much would you pay for a year of hassle-free parking in Walnut Creek?

It's auction time for local public elementary schools. At parties taking place over the next few weeks, parent organizations will auction off travel and entertainment packages, gift cards and items hand-crafted by the kids themselves. These auctions are big money-makers for school programs funded by parent-teacher organizations.

Perhaps the big-ticket item on any of the schools' auction rosters is a  "VIP" parking pass for downtown Walnut Creek. The Murwood Elementary Parent Teacher Association is auctioning it off at its Auction for Education gala this Saturday.

The listed value is $1500.

A Murwood mom shared this item with me.

The permit is donated by Regional Parking Inc., which manages many of the private lots around town. 

Anyway, you buy this permit and you can park in downtown lots managed by Regional Parking, any time of the day and any day of the year. You don't have to worry about running out to your car to feed the meter after two hours.

"An incredible luxury for a downtown worker or heavy shopper or anyone who likes the convenience of Free Parking," a description of the auction item reads.

I've seen Regional Parking donate this permit to other local nonprofits to auction off to raise money for their causes. The money raised by the Murwood Elementary auction will help some of those "extras" that state budget cuts have taken away: fund science education, library books, technology, a poetry program and teacher training to implement a writer's workshop in classrooms.

February 25, 2012

How your cat really -- as in medically -- could make you crazy

Now, it all begins to make sense: Why I am the way I am: slightly disturbed, neurotic and given to bouts of melancholia and -- new cool word I've learned -- acedia.

The cats that were family pets when I was growing up that cats I have now -- have made me crazy.

OK, maybe I am playing with the hyperbole here. But a Czech scientist, featured in the March issue of The Atlantic, is gaining renown for his theory that a parasite, carried by cats and excreted in their feces, quietly invades human brains and contributes to mental health disorders, such as dementia and schizophrenia, and to car crashes and suicides.

Until recently, evolutionary biologist Jaroslav Flegr, 63, has been toiling in obscurity on taxoplasma (T gondii), the microbe that causes toxoplasmosis, according to The Atlantic article.

Any woman who has been pregnant will remember the admonition against cleaning out cat litter boxes. The reason? Cats -- and their feces -- are the primary source of T. gondii infection in humans. Doctors have long recognized that if a woman becomes infected with the parasite during pregnancy she can transit the disease to her fetus, where it can cause brain damage or death.

I first heard about toxoplasmosis when writing about AIDS in the early 1990s. It was one of those opportunistic infections that afflictsAIDS patients, with their weakened immune systems, and causes dementia in the end stages.

Many people carry the parasite: more than half the people in the world and about 11 percent of the population in the United States, according to positive results in national health screenings. For most children and adults, the infection at most causes mild flu-like systems. Conventional medical thinking says the parasite lies dormant in brain cells. But according to The Atlantic, Flegr and other scientists believes this " 'latent'" parasite may be quietly tweaking the connections between our neurons," changing our response to frightening situations, our trust in others and, subtly, our personalities.

My husband read The Atlantic story with great interest. He has schizoaffective disorder -- a mental illness that has features of both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. As he set the magazine down to tell me about the story, he looked askance at our two cats, Fluffy and Pippin, who were both sleeping at a safe distance from each other on the couch. (Five-month-old Pippin, pictured above, likes to attack 13-year-old Fluffy, hoping she'll play with him; she just hisses, grumbles and swats at him.)

I told my husband he shouldn't blame Fluffy and Pippin. If cat-shedding T. gondii caused his schizophrenia, it's likely he was infected when he was very young. His family also had cats when he was growing up.

Flegr himself is T. gondii positive and his passion for the subject stems from his own belief that being infected with the parasite has caused personality quirks in him, The Atlantic said.

He blames the protozoan for shrinkage found in the cerebral cortexes of schizophrenia patients. In one study cited in the Atlantic article, almost all schizophrenia patients, shown by MRI scans to have brain shrinkage, tested positive for T. gondii. Another psychiatrist interviewed for the story, reviewed infection data and the MRI scans and concluded. "To me that suggests the parasite may trigger schizophrenia in genetically susceptible people."

Flegr isn't telling people to stopping having cats, The Atlantic says. He has two cats himself. He says indoor cats pose now threat because they would never be exposed to the parasite by hunting and eating rodents and other animals. Even outdoor cats only shed the parasites for three weeks of their lives, "typically when they are young and have just begun hunting."

Pippin will soon start going outside and he will probably want to hunt. During his first few weeks of going outside, we should just be sure to keep the kitchen counters and tables wiped clean.

Got $5 million? This Frank Lloyd Wright house in Orinda could be yours

Time for some house envy.

A landmark house in Orinda, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, is for sale. Frank Lloyd Wright designed this 1948 home in the wooded hills of Orinda for Katherine Z. and Maynard P. Buehler.

The Buehler house is one of the few homes Wright designed in the Bay Area.



It is a showcase of mid-century American modern architecture set in a 2.3-acre private Japanese garden, designed by Henry Matsutani, who also designed the Japanese Gardens in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park.

 "The Buehler House shows Wright playing with the division of space in creative ways," says the Been Seen travel website. "From the street the home resembles a flat-roofed concrete box, but when seen from the  garden, Wright's ingenious architectural flights of fancy are clearly visible."

The steel frame, 3-bedroom, 3.5-bath house with redwood panel cladding is built in what Wright labeled his Usonian style, a style inspired by a New World character of American landscape, "distinct and free from previous architectural conventions." In the Buehler house, this Usonian style translate into a distinct flat roof life, an L-shaped plan and organized around a modular grid.

For more information about how to view the agent, go to www.franklloydwrightthebuehlerhouse.com.




February 23, 2012

Sufism Reoriented vows federal fight over disputed sanctuary plans


At Tuesday’s special Contra Costa County supervisors meeting,  more than 100 people spoke out on many things for and against a religious group’s plans to build a big white 66,000-square-foot center in the unincorporated Saranap neighborhood of Walnut Creek.

And then  someone at the hearing at Walnut Creek's downtown Lesher Center for the Arts invoked the dreaded RLUIPA. The meaning behind this gag-inducing set of initials has the potential to take this dispute to a new and very litigious  level.

(Check out other big white monuments -- to power and ego? -- that grace communities near and far: The Mormon Temple in Oakland, of which the sanctuary would be two-thirds the size; the 58,000-square-foot building at 1500 Newell Avenue; the 55,000-square-foot White House; the 57,000-square-foot "manor" of late Charlie's Angels and Dynasty producer Aaron Spelling.)

The RLUIPA threat has always surrounded this issue, hovering in the background. But now we know how far Sufism Reoriented is prepared to go to defend its multi-domed complex, much of which will be built underground. In a statement to the supervisors, Sandy Skaggs, an attorney for Sufism Reoriented said,  “We are very prepared to defend this in court,” according to the Contra Costa Times.

The mechanism for this court fight would be RLUIPA, which stands for the 2000 federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. This law bars government entities from imposing land use regulations that create a "substantial burden" on a group's right to religious assembly. 

But constitutional scholar Marci Hamilton describes it as a law that can be burdensome to neighbors who oppose a church group’s expansion plans. Hamilton wrote a book God Versus the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law in which she devotes a chapter to church-state disputes in land-use issues. 

Before RLUIPA, religious landowners in virtually every jurisdiction in the United States “were just landowners,” writes Hamilton in her book. She is the Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law at Benjamin Cardozo School of Law.

Once upon a time, these landowners had to abide by zoning restrictions and take into account the views of homeowners regarding the impact of their proposal, she says. “They were property owners with equal rights under the land use law with all other property owners, and they had to be a good neighbor.”

RLUIPA changed all that, shifting the balance of power in residential neighborhoods to religious landowners, at the expense of the residential quality of the neighborhood, she says.

President Bill Clinton signed RLUIPA into law. Hamilton says Clinton never met a religious cause he would not support, and Congress made no effort to determine independently whether this “special interest legislation” was good for the people, Hamilton writes.

Congressional supporters of RLUIPA just went along with it, because religious leaders wanted it, Hamilton says. Religious organizations, with their growing political clout, lobbied for the law. The U.S. Supreme Court had invalidated as unconstitutional an earlier federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which basically gave religious entities a loophole for skirting all local, state and federal laws, including land-use laws.

Now with RLUIPA, residential landowners who face ambitious religious building plans don’t have the same right to equal protection, Hamilton contends. RLUIPA essentially creates two classes of citizens. “The first class is s ‘religious’ and the second class envelops everyone else. It is fundamentally unfair, as any homeowner who has been in this circumstance will tell you.’

Unfortunately, city and county entities are inclined to give in to religious organizations’ demands because, in these budget-challenged times, they can’t afford costly and lengthy court fights. Neighbors opposing a church’s plans usually don’t have the resources for a legal fight, either.

As Halfway to Concord blogger Wendy Lack pointed out, Sufism Reoriented had itself changed to an IRS-approved religious organization in 2003 after operating a nonprofit corporation since the 1950s. Gearing up for the big RLUIPA fight?

Sufism Reoriented might also have the deep pockets for a court challenge, reporting annual income for three years in a row of about $2.5 million and $17 million in assets. Cheesecake Factory CEO David M. Overton is a financial supporter, Lack reported.

The County Planning Commission gave the sanctuary proposal a thumbs up. Saranap residents appealed, and now it’s in the hands of supervisors who will continue their deliberations Wednesday.

In an editorial Thursday, the Contra Costa Times said Saranap residents have legitimate concerns about the project. It has more square footage than a football field and more than two-thirds that of the Mormon Temple in Oakland, which sits on 18 acres. The Sufism plan “would be jammed into three.”

In addition to size, the proposal has other serious problems, the Times said: the safety of the driveway access near a major road bend and “horribly inadequate parking.” 

The Sufis have been  playing the religious discrimination card all along, which is rather disappointing for a group is said to be forward thinking and community oriented. “Religious freedom does not give a faith community the right to run roughshod over reasonable planning guidelines and does not make those who question such a move bigots,” the Times editorial said. “The First Amendment protects not only religious expression, but speech as well. Residents are entitled to have their say -- and they should be listened to.”

For extensive coverage of Tuesday's hearing, go to Walnut Creek Patch

Previous Crazy in Suburbia posts:

Big, ugly “spaceship-looking” building or beautiful “sacred place?” Religious group’s sanctuary plans divide once tranquil WC/Lafayette neighborhood, March 15, 2009

Saranap neighbors protest large "spaceship-looking" Sufism sanctuary, March 17, 2009

Which would you rather have in your neighborhood? Sufism Reoriented's 66,000-square-foot sanctuary or Aaron Spelling's 57,000-square-foot "Manor?"March 28, 2009

Is Saranap's Sufism Reoriented sanctuary debate heating up again? Nov. 30, 2009

County requests EIR for controversial Sufism Reoriented sanctuary project Feb. 26, 2010

Sufism Reoriented says it, not the county, initiated the request for an EIR for its new sanctuary April 7, 2010

A Matter of Religious Freedom Nov. 1, 2011

A fundamental showdown: When a church group wants to expand its house of worship in a residential neighborhood Dec. 2, 2011

Supervisors should not cave to religious freedom arguments in the debate about the Sufism Reoriented sanctuary Feb. 19, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

February 21, 2012

Mental illness, Occupy protest figure into Berkeley hills homicide

On Saturday night, a 67-year-old resident in the Berkeley hills was beaten to death outside his home in a neighborhood described as an affluent area. Police have arrested a 23-year-old man, whom they found nearby 15 minutes after responding to the attack.

Two very hot-button issues have emerged in the case.  The first is that the suspect, Daniel Jordan Dewitt, suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, his mother told the Oakland Tribune. The second is that police didn't respond to a first phone call made from the victim,  Peter Cukor, because officers were tied up in monitoring an Occupy protest that was moving from Oakland into Berkeley. 


Comments are streaming into a story on the case posted on the Berkeleyside blog.

With DeWitt's mother saying she had tried but failed for four years to get her son checked into a long-term mental health facility, debate has erupted over the nation's broken mental health system and the rights and wrongs of institutionalizing people with mental illness. 

"I can't tell you how many times he has been in and out of the hospital," Candy Dewitt told the Oakland Tribune. She said her son didn't appear to suffer any mental health problems as he attended Alameda High School and played football. But around the time he was 18, he started to show symptoms. He was diagnosed with schizophrenia. He would go into the hospital, respond well to medication and then get released, Candy DeWitt said. Once out of the hospital, he did what a fair number of people with mental illnesses do -- he stopped taking his meds.

“Our system is such that they go in, they shove them full of all kinds of antipsychotics and put them back out on the street again,” DeWitt told KTVU Channel 2.

The other touchy subject comes from Berkeley police saying they received a call from the victim's hillside address in northeastern Berkeley at 8:45 p.m.  In a statement, Berkeley police Capt. Michael Meehan said the department received a report of a suspicious person possibly trespassing. "The caller reported an encounter with an unknown person “hanging around” his property, and asked that an officer be sent to investigate.

Because of concerns about "the potential for violence" associated with a protest march moving from Oakland into Berkeley, the department would only respond to criminal, in-progress emergency calls, Meehan said.


A "source familiar with the case" told the Tribune that Cukor and his wife arrived home, found the suspect near their garage, asking to see a woman. They told the suspect there was no one there by that name and asked him to leave. Berkeley police Lt. Andrew Greenwood said the victim called the non-emergency line and "calmly reported" an encounter with a strange person on his property.

Cukor apparently walked to a nearby fire station, possibly to summon medical help for the trespasser. Firefighters were out on a call. When Cukor returned to his property, he was pushed to the ground, dragged into some bushes and severely beaten.

At 9 p.m., Meehan said, an officer offered to respond to one of two pending "suspicious circumstances" calls. One of those was the call made from Cukor. The officer's offer was declined because the call wasn't deemed an in-progress emergency call, Meehan said. Two minutes later, at approximately 9:02 p.m., Berkeley police received a phone call reporting an attack in progress.

Within a minute, officers were dispatched and drove to the crime scene with their emergency lights and sirens going. Paramedics arrived and treated Cukor but he later died.

With regard to the claim by police that their officers were tied up, save for in-progress emergency calls, one Berkeleyside reader bemoaned the department's readiness to point fingers at the Occupy movement.

 "If we're going to point fingers at Occupy," wrote another. "Why not also point fingers at the folks who cut California's mental health budget last year?"





 

Mortality


Interesting insight into the death of one of Hollywood’s great stars emerged in a medical journal article I read recently.

The information has to do with a set of heart attacks that killed Clark Gable in November 1960. The article in question has a very long title and summarizes the history of coronary care in America. The article was published in a 2011 issue of Circulation, the journal of the American Heart Association.

I was reading the article for a story I was writing, but the topic of coronary care has personal interest.. In October, I learned that I have a heart condition. I have an irregular heart beat that one Sunday afternoon caused my heart to stop beating several times. I spent the night in John Muir Medical Center’s cardiac care unit before undergoing surgery to receive a pacemaker.

Clark Gable was 59 when he died. The Circulation article focuses on the care he received between two heart attacks he suffered 10 days apart. Gable received the best, top of the line care possible for 1960. The “king” of Hollywood consulted with the most renown cardiologists in Los Angeles. Nonetheless, he suffered his second attack, which was fatal, after he left the hospital and was recovering at home.

 “The recent death of a prominent motion picture performer, whose medical management was of unqualified excellence, precipitated nationwide headlines in the lay press and created a public  awareness that, even with optimum care and smooth convalescence, recovery was not assured.”

This statement came from Morris Wilburne, a Los Angeles cardiologist, who was speaking at the American Medical Association’s annual conference in 1962. Wilburne, who was on the faculty at the University of Southern California, was one of the first doctors to publish articles describing the concept of a special hospital unit designed to treat patients with heart attacks and other heart conditions.

Gable sounds like he was a heart attack waiting to happen. He was always a heavy drinker and smoker, according to the Hollywood history website, Findadeath.com. As he entered his 50s, the one-time MGM box office champion put on weight, ballooning from 190 to 235 pounds. When a movie role came along, he would quickly shed pounds by crash dieting and consuming tons of diet pills.

The film he was making right before his death was the modern-day cowboy drama The Misfits, co-starring two other ill-fated legends, Marilyn Monroe and Montgomery Clift. Much has been written about the stressful, physically demanding shoot. Maybe he-man Gable did his own lassoing stunts, though others doubt that a studio insurance company would allow a 59-year-old star to do such strenuous work. There was also gossip about how Monroe’s  famous insecurities, lateness and “semi-comatose appearances” wore Gable out.

On Friday, November 4, 1960, Gable didn’t feel well as he finished shooting a close-up shot with Monroe at Paramount studios. The next day, he doubled over with severe chest pains while changing a tire on his jeep at his Encino  home.  He and his wife couldn’t call 911 because 911 didn’t exist at the time. Not sufficiently aware that chest pains signaled a life-threatening emergency, they also didn’t think to call a doctor or take Gable to the hospital. Instead, Gable ate an early dinner and went to bed. A bad headache kept him awake much of the night. Finally at 7:15 a.m. Sunday, the chest pains returned, Gable collapsed, and his wife called the local fire department and his doctor.

An ambulance sped him to Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital, where tests confirmed Gable had a heart attack. Bypass surgery was a procedure of the future. Gable’s state-of-the-art treatment consisted of sedatives, anti-coagulants and rest. “The only hint of future treatment was a large machine called a pacemaker brought into his room,” Findadeath.com said.

The Circulation article explains that up until the early 1960s heart patients convalesced in wards or standard hospital rooms with little or no monitoring by staff trained to respond immediately to cardiac arrest.

Gable’s recovery was “uneventful,” the Circulation article said. He stayed in the hospital 10 days. “It was reported that he was looking his old self again, and his color had returned. He was chatting to the nurses and sitting up in bed reading – and probably smoking as well,” Findadeath.com said.

On the evening of Friday, November 16, Gable was back at home. Just before 11 p.m. Gable was in bed looking through a magazine when he lay his head back on a pillow and died.

A remarkable woman introduced me to the Circulation article. This woman, Kathleen Dracup, became a nurse in the mid-1960s and found her calling caring for patients recovering from heart attacks. I was assigned to write a profie on Dracup, the former dean of UC San Francisco’s School of Nursing and one of nursing’s most important pioneers. As I learned during my research, Dracaup has become internationally renowned for her clinical and research work on patients recovering from heart attacks and living with heart disease.

Dracup began caring for heart attack patients at the time hospitals were establishing the first departments dedicated to their treatment. As I wrote in my profile, the invention of ECG machines, external defibrillators and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the early 1960s gave doctors and nurses the the tools to set up coronary care units where staff could employ life-saving measures within minutes. 

Dracup’s research over the years has focused on the emotional needs of heart patients and their families, She became interested in finding ways to help these patients get well and stay out of the hospital.

Dracup explained to me how medical advances, including diagnostic tools and prevention strategies, have shifted the emphasis of care from people dying of heart attacks to people learning to live with a chronic heart condition. She said that people don’t die from heart attacks with the same frequency as they once did in, say, Clark Gable’s day.  Also, the typical heart patient is no longer a man in his 50s,  like Gable, but someone who 20 years older.

Good follow-up and outpatient, preventive care is key, Dracup’s research shows. The follow-up includes counseling and education for patients and families about life-style changes, managing medications, identifying symptoms and responding to emergencies.

That kind of counseling, education and follow up care was not available to Clark Gable and his wife, who was pregnant with his son. 

In photos, 59-year-old Clark Gable looks, well, old. Today’s top movie idols, upon entering their 50s – Harrison Ford, George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise -- generally look younger and healthier. These guys seem too secure in their fame to rely on plastic surgery – at least in any overt way. They look like they take good care of themselves -- not like they drink heavily and smoke three packs a day.

I think that’s true of men and women in general these days. We know better. We take care of ourselves. We go in for regular physicals where doctors check for heart-problem warning signs such as high cholesterol or high blood pressure. We learn to eat better, exercise more, give up smoking if we haven’t already.

Fifty-nine doesn’t seem so old anymore. That’s only 10 years older than me. Fortunately, my “heart condition” doesn’t constitute a chronic condition for which I must take medication to preserve what healthy heart tissue I have left. Aside from some faulty electrical circuitry, my heart is in good shape. 

So, I don't feel old -- not like Gable looked old in his final decade. But maybe I'm in denial.

February 19, 2012

Supervisors should not cave to religious freedom arguments in the debate about the Sufism Reoriented sanctuary


Call me anti-religious. But Sufism Reoriented's desire to build a big white complex in Walnut Creek's residential Saranap community shouldn't get any more consideration than any secular property owner whose grandiose construction ambitions ignite neighborhood concerns.


The three-year-old controversy is now in the hands of Contra County Board of Supervisors. They will hold a special all-day hearing at Walnut Creek's Lesher Center for the Arts Tuesday. Hundreds are expected to speak at the meeting, at which the supervisors will decide on an appeal by Saranap neighbors who disagree with the county Planning Commission's November decision to allow the 66,000-square-foot sanctuary to rise on 3.12 acres on Boulevard Way. 


All along, the 350-member organization has said that the white, multi-domed design of their proposed  sanctuary embodies "our most sacred beliefs and supports our worship."  The
Contra Costa County Interfaith Council supports the Sufi plan, with the Rev. Brian Stein-Webber, director of the council, telling the Contra Costa Times that religions, even those outside the mainstream, as Sufism Reoriented is, should have a right to build within their community. Opposition to design elements of the project are the result of unintended religious bias, one Sufism member, Pascal Kaplan, said during testimony before the Planning Commission. 


Sure, religious organizations should be able to build in their communities, but they shouldn't receive special consideration to build what they want just because they are a religious organization.


In a post in December, I quoted constitutional scholar Marci Hamilton, an expert on church-state relations, on the problems that arise when church organizations gain special privileges in land use and other disputes. A federal law, such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, shifts the balance of power in residential neighborhoods to religious landowners. "The residential quality of a neighborhood takes a back seat to the interests of the church group," she wrote in her book God versus the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law. "The untoward result is that homeowners become second-class citizens to their religious neighbors."  


Hamilton supports religious freedom, but wants reasonable limits for the good of everyone. "Religion's force can be just another iteration of the drive to power," she writes, saying that Americans should get over an unrealistic and hazardous belief "that religion is always for the good."
She says that "some religious conduct deserves freedom and some requires limitation."


It's possible that religious issues will come up in Tuesday's meeting. religious grounds.


County planning staff have recommended that the supervisors deny the appeal and allow the project to go forward. Most of their reasons for approval hinge on their opinion that Sufism Reoriented has adequately addressed parking, traffic and other environmental impacts. Essentially, staff says the single-family residential high-density zoning in that area allows for churches and religious institutions. The proposed sanctuary meets all the necessary development standards, which are the same for religious buildings as they for residential structures.

But staff also cites Sufism religious practices as a reason for approving its size and design. Neighbors object to the 66,000 square feet -- similar in scale to downtown Walnut Creek's new library or Neiman Marcus department store. They also object to the 13 white domes, saying they are inconsistent with the character of the rest of the neighborhood.


Staff acknowledges that  "the style is unique" but they say it reflects "the central tenants of the applicant's religious beliefs." The organization has also adequately explained its spiritual needs for such a large building, staff say. "The members of Sufism worship and celebrate the founder through the arts, music, drama and dance and therefore, the display, storage and shipping of art, scoring room, prayer hall etc. are necessary."


While Sufism Reoriented says they need this particular design for their religious practices, their desire should not trump neighbors' desire to stop a massive construction project from going in near their homes. As I said, call me anti-religious. Or just say that I agree with Hamilton in the very American ideal of separation of church and state.


In a lot of ways, the Sufism plan is the equivalent of the big ugly house your grandiose neighbor wants to build -- a situation that doesn't necessarily bode well for opponents of the sanctuary project.


I'm sure the homeowners who built that big ugly house on the Alamo hill overlooking Interstate 680 were as dedicated to their views of design and aesthetics as Sufism members are to theirs.


Actually, the county has a tendency to support big ugly houses in unincorporated areas, like that Alamo house or the ones dominating the hill overlooking the Parkmead neighborhood. So, if those projects can go through, I can easily see the Sufism sanctuary project ultimately getting the green light.