Pages

Showing posts with label Animal Rescue Foundation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Animal Rescue Foundation. Show all posts

January 15, 2010

Do you believe local hero Tony La Russa when he says he didn't know Mark McGwire was juicing?


I realize this question may be a bit out of, ahem, left field for me (Am I getting my sports metaphor right?) I am not a baseball fan. I don't dislike baseball, but I just don't follow it. I couldn't even tell you who won the last world series!

But I have been totally fascinated by this whole baseball and steroids issue. I devoured all the San Francisco Chronicle exposes on Barry Bonds, and tried to follow, as much as I had time for, the 2005 Senate hearings at which former Oakland A's and St. Louis Cardinals slugger Mark McGwire refused to answer questions about steroid use during his playing career.

And on Monday, we had McGwire's tear-filled apology press blitz. Arranged by former George W. Bush secretary Ari Fleischer, according to the New York Times. (Rolling my eyes on that one). And we heard from La Russa, saying he had no idea at all until Monday that McGwire was using steroids. La Russa was McGwire's manager when he was both in Oakland and St. Louis.

As I said, La Russa is a local hero for establishing the Animal Rescue Foundation, the well-regarded Walnut Creek-based nonprofit that bears his name.

But does La Russa's denial of knowing anything about McGwire's steroid use ring true, and does it tarnish La Russa's good guy image? Some baseball fan bloggers are highly skeptical of La Russa's denial, and even disappointed and angry about it.

From MLB Fanhouse's Terrence Moore's column, McGwire, La Russa not fooling anybody

It's nice that Mark McGwire finally admitted on Monday what everybody already knew years a go. Plus, you're always better off telling the truth -- no matter how long you've perpetuated a blatant lie, but none of this matters. ...


... This is disgusting. I'm talking about everything, ranging from McGwire remaining a coward by announcing through a printed statement to the Associated Press that he spent parts of a decade slamming all of those home runs with a boost from steroids (surprise, surprise) to St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa continuing to insult our intelligence in so many ways.


Let's get La Russa's silliness out of the way. To hear him tell it, he hadn't a clue that McGwire was swinging and juicing throughout his career. He said he only discovered as much when McGwire phoned him on Monday with the news -- you know, presumably either before or after La Russa realized the Earth was round.


This is the same La Russa who was McGwire's manager during his first 10 seasons in the major leagues with the Oakland Athletics and his last five with the Cardinals. This is the same La Russa with a prominent law degree, which would make you think he is fairly observant -- maybe enough to see that somebody he was around nearly every day for 15 seasons was growing from a skinny little thing into Ivan Drago from Rocky IV. This is the same La Russa who told ESPN, "I'm really encouraged that [McGwire] would step forward. As we go along, his explanations will be well received."


Guess La Russa really does think the Earth is flat. Either that, or he wants the rest of us to believe as much.

January 3, 2010

ARF's Celebrity 2010 calendar: Sully (of course), Warren Buffet, some other cool (and sexy) people--but Greta Van Susteren?

The East Bay's patron saint of animal rescue, former Oakland Athletics and current St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa, has put out a 2010 celebrity calendar to raise money for his worthy and well-regarded Walnut Creek-based Animal Rescue Foundation.

On the cover of the calendar is none other than America's favorite hero commercial pilot, Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, with his wife, Lorrie. The Danville couple are posed with "Twinkle," a retired canine member of Guide Dogs for the Blind, and an Animal Rescue Foundation adopted kitty. Sully and Lorrie, who have become international celebrities since Sully's last year's "miracle" landing of his crippled jet on the Hudson River in New York, are also featured in the calendar's month of April.

Other celebrities--local, national, and international--and pets who grace this "one-of-a-kind' calendar are: The Office star Jenna Fischer: Iron Chef Cat Cora; uber-cool filmmaker Steven Soderbergh (friend of George, Julia, and Brad); and iconic businessman and philanthropist Warren Buffett. Each calendar costs $15 and benefits ARF's various programs: pet adoption; pet spay and neutering' and children's animal care education. ARF also provides financial assistance for veterinary care for low-income families in Contra Costa County. You can purchase one of your own calendars at ARF's website.

Also in the calendar is--va-va-va-voom--Holly Madison, described as a TV personality, model, and Vegas star. In the ARF calendar, the blond bombshell is more modestly attired, posing with two dogs. 


OK, now my quibble: Fox News Anchor Greta Van Susteren.  Ewww. "Mike," the big furry cat she's clutching is cute, but Greta?  BFF to Sarah and Todd Palin? Greta, who traded in her authentic hangdog legal analyst look of her O.J. Simpson trial coverage days for her current obnoxious, and highly publicized plasticized Fox Anchor persona?

Greta is, along with Nancy Grace, on my top 10 list of annoying TV cable "news" personalities. Couldn't ARF have done without her?

November 7, 2009

Friday's misadventures with a lost pooch, and a humble plea to dog owners

I'm not a dog person. This doesn't mean I dislike dogs. I'm rather fond of some of my friends' dogs. I would just never choose to have a dog myself. I don't have a "dog" personality. Yes, I'm a cat person. Also, I wouldn't want to take on the very big responsibility and commitment it takes to have a dog.

Despite not being a dog person, I still find myself in the odd position of occasionally coming across lost doggies wandering in some neighborhood, and jumping in to help that dog find its way home. If I don't care about dogs, why do I do this? Well, I know how devastated I'd be if our cat disappeared. I also know my dog owner friends would feel likewise if they felt they the canine member of their family had run off.

I also understand that even the most conscientious dog owners can wind up dealing with a runaway Fido, even after installing all the reasonable safeguards in their homes and properties. Some dogs just have big cases of wanderlust, right, and they manage to find their way over, under, or around fences.

Bad, bad dogs, huh?

I've generally had a good, easy time getting lost dogs back to owner. The only time I actually spent a day or so babysitting a lost dog was back when my son was 2, I was a stay at home mom, and we lived in a small town up north. A very pretty black lab wandered through the forest into our back yard. Unfortunately, he had lost his tags along the way. I was in the situation, being at home, and we had the space in our house to let the dog stay, while waiting for the owners to check in with the town police department and come across my found dog report.

My son and I briefly got attached the the lab he named "Bobby," and my husband, who has fond memories of the black lab his grandparents had when he was a kid, contemplated that we might end up having to adopt him.

In most of my other found dog situations, the dogs had tags, and I was able to call the owners' numbers and connect with them almost immediately. I didn't have to deal with reporting the dog lost or taking it to the county's animal services shelter.

Well, yesterday, I had the frustrating experience of picking up a sweet lost beagle (not the one pictured here), and not being able to reach his owners for hours. It was actually one of those days where I was feeling a bit frazzled, from not sleeping much all week with my Moon Mania. Then I had been up much of the night trying to finish a work project, and I was looking forward to putting the finishing touches on said project yesterday afternoon.

But at around 1 p.m., while driving back to work after dropping my son off from school, I came across the poor wandering beagle.

I stopped my car, called the dog to me, and he came. He was friendly, sweet, obviously well cared for. His tag said his name was "Cody." I called the number and reached what sounded like the voicemail for a home number.

Great.

People, a home phone number in this situation, and in this day, is rather useless. That's because most people aren't at home during the day; they are out shopping, picking up the kids from school, at work, or out of town. Or they aren't picking up their phones if they are at home, because they don't want to deal with telemarketers.

There was an address on the dog's tags, but the street did not sound familiar to me. I noticed, just up the street, a U.S. postal truck. The dog happily hopped into my car, and I drove up to the truck. I asked the nice female postal worker if she knew the address. After all, this was her "beat." It didn't ring a bell to her, and, it turned out, she lived in the neighborhood. She called back to her office, and someone there tried, but failed, to find the street name in their database. She admitted that she had seen the beagle out in the neighborhood a couple hours earler.

Okay, I had to get back to work... I couldn't take Cody home, and I couldn't keep him for a few days. I was going out of town first thing Saturday for a work trip. ... I put Cody in my car, drove to my office, left the windows cracked open, left him in the car, and ran in to do my own search of his address, and to call around to see what my options were. Of course, he started to wail as soon as I left him alone in the car.

Still no answer at his owners' house. Like me, some co-workers were worried that if I called Contra Costa County Animal Services to come get him, he'd wind up at risk of being euthanized in a few days if his owners didn't claim him. As it happens, the worker I reached at Animals Services said they were so understaffed and so overwhelmed with service calls that they couldn't come out to get him anyway; I'd have to bring him to their office, unless I could keep him myself?

Not an option. I called the Animal Rescue Foundation, but someone there said they only take animals already at shelters. I called back to the Animal Services department, and a volunteer there convinced me that, in the absence of keeping him myself until the owners contacted me, my best bet would be to bring him to their shelter. He assured me that I had done the right thing in picking up up in the first place. "Better he come here than end up being hit by a car."

So, I took him out to the shelter out by the Interstate 680/Highway 4 intersection. It's actually a nice, newer building, and the staff there were really friendly and welcoming to Cody. They looked more carefully at his tags and found that they were old, from 2005. Their records showed a different address for the owners than the one on his tag. And on a street that, Google maps showed, was way the hell on the other side of Walnut Creek. Several miles. Could Cody have wandered that far to the place I found him? How long had he been missing?

The county's records also showed two different phone numbers. One was disconnected. But the other got me through to a voicemail that presumably belonged to the owner. Maybe a work number. Maybe a cell phone. I called and left yet another message.

I said good-bye to Cody and hoped for the best.

I got back to the office, but was too frazzled by the misadventures with Cody and concern about his well-being to get much more work done. I had spent nearly three hours dealing with poor Cody. I was also thinking how I had to get home, pack, and get ready to leave on a trip first thing Saturday morning.

My husband, son, and I were enjoying at dinner at Le Cheval when my cell phone rang. It was about 7 p.m. It was Cody's "mom." "You called several times?" she said. I explained I had found Cody wandering in this particular neighborhood, tried to reach her, and ended up having to take him to the shelter.

"He's such an escape artist!" she said, with a nervous laugh.

Ha ha.

"Well, thanks for your trouble," she said before hanging up.

I didn't really care about getting her thanks. Frankly, I was annoyed. Sure, I had lost some valuable work time dealing with her dog, but I would have done it anyway. What annoyed me is that, for her "escape artist," she had outdated tags and old or not very useful contact information on his licensing information

I mean, six hours went by before she finally got back to me!

I thought that, for some dog owners, their dogs are like members of their family. Isn't that right? I couldn't stand finding out that a valued member of my family had been missing for six hours, and I didn't know about it. With my son, there is all sorts of contact information on file at his school, or when he goes on a field trip. Yes, his home number is included in that contact information, but that would be mostly useless. That file has work numbers and cell phone numbers for me and his father, as well as phone numbers for other relatives.

I'm not saying Cody's tag needed to carry all his owners various contact numbers. But it would have been nice if it had contained that one phone number where his owner could be reached immediately--not six hours later.


So, dog owners, here is my humble plea. Check your pet's tags, and make sure the address is current, and that the phone number is the one where you will be most easily reached. There are lots of people in the community who would be happy to pick up your lost pet and help him or her find his way home to you. But try to make it as easy as possible, okay?