Notable Walnut Creek figures--La Russa, a Nejedly--drop lawsuits against, respectively, Twitter, siblings

Dropped Lawsuit No. 1: La Russa versus Twitter

Tony La Russa, Walnut Creek's favorite Major League Baseball team manager and Animal Rescue Foundation guru, officially dropped his questionable lawsuit against social networking site Twitter. La Russa, manager of the St. Louis Cardinals, sued Twitter over that annoying practice of people appropriating celebrities' names to create fake profiles. According to La Russa's complaint, the faux La Russa tweeted comments that the real La Russa found demaging to his reputation, comments that touched on La Russa's 2007 DUI arrest and made light of the deaths of two Cardinals players.

As annoyed as La Russa might have been, he didn't have much of a legal case, or so say most experts in media law and First Amendment. As the site, Techdirt.com, pointed out, the profile was obviously fake, intended as satire, and even included a fake bio.

Actually, when I saw headlines today that La Russa, the former Oakland A's manager, had dropped the lawsuit, I thought, what, didn't this case get settled already?

As Techdirt.com reports, it turns out that the Associated Press got some facts wrong when it reported last month that La Russa and Twitter had reached a settlement over the case. The AP just went with La Russa's claim that Twitter had agreed to pay legal fees and donate money to La Russa's foundation. Twitter said, oh no, we didn't settle anything, even calling La Russa's suit “an unnecessary waste of judicial resources bordering on frivolous." Media law experts agree that if anyone was liable for La Russa being offended it was the creator of the fake profile, not Twitter.

Here's an image of the court document showing that La Russa voluntarily dropped the case June 26 and that each party will bear its own legal costs. Oh, and the image above left is La Russa's mugshot from his 2007 arrest.

Dropped Lawsuit No. 2: Nejedly versus Nejedly versus Nejedly Piepho

The Contra Costa Times Lisa Vorderbrueggen reported today that the bitter family lawsuit over the estate of the late State Sen. John A. Nejedly has come to a close, at least in Contra Costa County Superior County.

Nejedly's oldest son, John T. Nejedly, a Contra Costa Community College trustee, has dropped his lawsuit against brother, Jim Nejedly, and sister, Mary Nejedly Piepho, the county supervisor. John T. Nejedly had accused his siblings of coercing their ailing and elderly father, who died at age 91 in 2006, of disinheriting him.

The case grew bitter when close friends and family said the senator shut his oldest out of his will because he was heartbroken over his son's struggles with "cocaine and alcohol abuse" and "serious" marital troubles.

It seems that John T. started to earn a bit of a reputation in his youth. My mom recently told me that he was described as a bit of a "smart aleck" by her friend, who had been the secretary at the old Del Valle High School on Tice Valley Road, where John T. Nejedly was a student. This secretary also lived down the street from the grassy, oak-covered, multi-acre Nejedly family estate, which the senator's main asset and which was at the center of the lawsuit.

Both Jim and Mary Piepho expressed relief that the suit was over, and Piepho told Vorderbrueggen that she wished her brother the best as he "moves on with his life." I take this statement to mean that the three siblings and their families won't be getting together for Thanksgiving or other major holidays.

Life-styles of Contra Costa's rich and politically connected: Not so charmed

There are two intriguing updates on the trials and tribulations of PeopleSoft founder David Duffield's failed plans to build an uber mega-mansion in an exclusive Alamo enclave and the sibling rivalry-turned lawsuit among the three adult surviving children of the late state Senator John A. Nejedly. These updates are reported in today's column by Contra Costa Times Political Editor Lisa Vorderbrueggen.

It turns out that Alamo residents and Save Mount Diablo prevailed in their 3 1/2-year battle to force Duffield to scale back the size of his mansion. Darn, at its originally planned 72,000 square feet, it would have been bigger than Hearst Castle, the model for Citizen Kane's Xanadu and it could have potentially been the biggest, ugliest house in suburbia, a showcase for my occasional Big, Ugly Houses feature. This is a feature that some readers love and others detest. Citizen Kane's Xanadu received a mention in my first Big, Ugly Houses post.

Actually, at 18,067-square-feet, it could still qualify for a Big, Ugly Houses write-up. That is, if Duffield lives up to to principles of Big, Ugly Househood, and hires an architect with an aesthetic design sense out of the '80s, that era of big hair, big shoulder pads, Dynasty, and over-the-top Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous displays of lavish living and "champagne wishes and caviar dreams."

Vorderbrueggen reports that "Save Mount Diablo withdrew its challenge of the project and in exchange Duffield will place conservation easements on roughly half the 21-acre parcel, which is next door to Mount Diablo State park. For the neighbors, Duffield agreed to a plethora of conditions such as restrictions on construction hours and the use of worker shuttles to cut down on traffic."

Speaking of Duffield, he sold Pleasanton-based PeopleSoft to Oracle in 2005 and in February 2008 founded Workday Inc. in Walnut Creek, described in a press release as company that delivers software to customers that help them "to link technology solutions to meet business requirements."

The Nejedly sibling rivalry is pretty nasty and, according to Vorderbrueggen, is heading to court. It centers on a lawsuit filed by one of Nejedly's son's, Contra Costa Community College Trustee John T. Nejedly. He asserts that his brother, James, and sister Mary Nejedly Piepho, the Contra Costa County supervisor, "conspired to cheat him out of his share of the estate of their father," who served as state senator for District 7 from 1969-1980 and who died in 2006 at age 91. (Pictured here is the Nejedly patriarch, John A. Nejedly, and his three children, Mary, James, and John T., in evidently happier times).

In a July 2007 story Vorderbrueggen wrote about the family squabble, she said that court records show that John T. Nejedly alleges that "his father disinherited him under the influence of painkillers and hostile siblings. The rift between him and his aging father began widening in late 2002 when Jim and Mary 'made repeated false assertions' to their father that his elder son was using 'alcohol and drugs, that he could not be trusted, that he was a danger to himself, and that he had abandoned his wife and children.'

Vordebrueggen quotes a "a longtime family friend" who "recalled the senator confiding in her often about his problems with John T., describing [the late senator] as heartbroken and disillusioned by his son's behavior."

The estate in question mostly involves 13 grassy, oak-covered acres in Walnut Creek near Tice Valley Boulevard, which the late senator purchased in 1951. I'm familiar with this property. It's in the neighborhood where I grew up, and we always knew it as belonging to a local political celebrity, John Nejedly, the one-time Contra Costa District Attorney and state senator.

Senator Nejedly, in his trust, sought to maintain the rural nature of the land, Vorderbrueggen writes. He also wanted to repay his son James, and his wife, Jaine, who maintained the estate and helped the old man stay in the house he built there, rather than be sent to a nursing home.

In today's column, Vordebrueggen says, "James and Mary say they are honoring the wishes of their father, who clearly spelled out in his trust and in a taped video why he disinherited John T." Apparently, the siblings tried to work out their dispute through mediation, and a court date has been set for August.